Trung Quốc công khai đề cao sở hữu tư nhân, dùng roi vọt thị trường để kỷ luật doanh nghiệp quốc hữu. Cùng một hệ thống chính trị, sao trí thức nước họ dám nghĩ, trong khi các giáo sư tiến sĩ nước ta run sợ đến thảm hại, đồng thanh ê a những giáo lý cổ hủ lụi tàn. Một thời thật hổ thẹn.
Arbitration can be very simple, but it can also be a voyage to nowhere in the middle of the sea. From the departure to destination, the Tribunal as collective is expected to steer the board. It shall make decisions, either procedural or on merits, by deliberation. But how tribunal deliberations work, particularly in cross-cultural arbitration? That is certainly a mysterious black-box, because tribunal deliberations are case specific (it depends on the nature of the disputes), tribunal specific (it depends on the composition of the tribunal, the background and profile, and mentality of the presiding arbitrator and its fellows), and the like. But there are some best practice for efficient deliberations: Not consensus, but collegiality is important: each arbitrator shall actively be involved. Not focusing on the destination, enjoying the voyage: the facts, the issues, the rational behind the disputes are important. Not merely the award, an efficient case management, fairness and due